ABACUS: MYSTERY OF THE BEAD
The Bead Unbaffled - An Abacus Manual
Revising Division 278502 ÷ 399 = 698
This is a good revision example because in one instance we revise the first number of the quotient on rod I down to 7 only to find that we must revise it down a second time to 6 in order to compete the first part of the division problem. (See steps 3 - 6 below for clarification.)
Step 1: Set the dividend on rods J through O and the divisor on rods CDE (Fig 1)
Fig. 1
Step 1A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 0 2 7 8 5 0 2
Step 2: In looking at the problem it's evident that 27÷ 3 = 9 but in order to continue we need a remainder so we'll go lower and choose 8 as the first number in our answer.Step 2a: Set 8 on rod I. Multiply 3 x 8 and subtract the product 24 from rods JK (Fig.2)
Fig. 2
Step 2A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 0 2 7 8 5 0 2 (8) Step 2 - 2 4 Step 2a 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 8 0 3 8 5 0 2
We have an error. With only 38 remaining on rods KL we don't have enough to subtract 9 x 8 = 72, in other words we've subtracted 3 from our dividend one too many times. Solution: we must revise both the quotient and the dividend.Step 3: Reduce the quotient by 1 making it 7.
Step 3a: Continue the revision by adding 3 to the dividend on rod K (Fig 3)
Fig. 3
Step 3A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 8 0 3 8 5 0 2 - 1 Step 3 + 3 Step 3a 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 7 0 6 8 5 0 2
Step 4: Having completed the revision in the above step we have 68 on rods KL which this is enough to continue. Multiply 9 x 7 and subtract the product 63 from rods JK (Fig.4)
Fig. 4
Step 4A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 7 0 6 8 5 0 2 (7) - 6 3 Step 4 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 5 0 2
Once again we have an error. In order to continue we need to be able to subtract a further 9 x 7 = 63, this time from rods LM. With only 55 available, we've subtracted 39 one too many times from the dividend. Once again, we must revise both the quotient and the dividend.Step 5: Reduce the quotient by 1 making it 6.
Step 5a: Continue to revise by adding 39 to the dividend on rods KL (Fig.5)
Fig. 5
Step 5A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 5 0 2 - 1 Step 5 + 3 9 Step 5a 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 0 4 4 5 0 2
Step 6: Having completed the revision in the above step we have enough to continue. Multiply 9 x 6 and subtract the product 54 from rods LM (Fig. 6)
Fig. 6
Step 6A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 0 4 4 5 0 2 (6) - 5 4 Step 6 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 0 3 9 1 0 2
Step 7: For the next number in the quotient it seems reasonable to choose 9. Therefore set 9 on rod J and multiply 9 times each of the numbers in the divisor. Subtract each product from the dividend leaving the remainder on rods LMNO (Fig. 7)
Fig. 7
Step 7A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 3 9 1 0 2 (9) - 2 7 Step 7 - 8 1 Step 7a - 8 1 Step 7b 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 0 3 1 9 2
Step 8: Once again it looks like 9 might be a good choice for the next answer in the quotient. Set 9 on rod K, multiply 3 x 9 and subtract the product 27 from rods LM (Fig. 8)
Fig. 8
Step 8A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 9 3 1 9 2 (9) - 2 7 Step 8 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 9 0 4 9 2
Another error has occurred. With only 49 on rods MN we don't have enough to subtract 9 x 9 = 81.Step 9: Revise by subtracting 1 from the quotient.
Step: 9a: Continue the revision by adding 3 to rod M of the dividend.
Fig. 9
Step 9A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 9 0 4 9 2 - 1 Step 9 + 3 Step 9a 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 7 9 2
Step 10: Multiply the revised quotient 9 x 8 and subtract the product 72 from rod MNStep 10a: Multiply 9 x 8 again and subtract the product 72 from rods NO (Fig.10)
Fig. 10
Step 10A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O . . . . . 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 7 9 2 (8) - 7 2 Step 10 - 7 2 Step 10a 0 0 3 9 9 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 0 0 0
▪ Abacus: Mystery of the Bead
▪ Advanced Abacus Techniques© August, 2011
Totton Heffelfinger Toronto Ontario Canada
totton[at]idirect[dot]com